UAEServicesUAE Taxation & Regulatory ComplianceTransfer PricingMaster File & Local File Preparation

UAE Taxation & Regulatory Compliance · Transfer Pricing

Master File & Local File Preparation

A Master File and Local File are not filed with the Federal Tax Authority as a matter of course — they are built, kept current, and produced within the stipulated window, generally 30 days, whenever the FTA asks.

Chartered Accountants · Dubai · Since 1986

What Master File & Local File Preparation is

Master File and Local File preparation is the documentation exercise that evidences a UAE taxable person's arm's length position under Article 34 of the Corporate Tax Law (Federal Decree-Law No. 47 of 2022, applicable to financial years starting on or after 1 June 2023). Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 sets out the two-tier structure directly: the Master File presents the group-wide picture — organisational structure, description of the businesses conducted, ownership and location of intangibles, intercompany financing arrangements, and the group's consolidated financial and tax position — while the Local File is entity-specific, setting out the UAE taxable person's own material related-party and connected-person transactions, the Functional, Asset and Risk (FAR) analysis behind them, the transfer pricing method applied to each transaction category, and the benchmarking analysis that supports the pricing actually used.

Both documents are required where a taxable person is part of a Multinational Enterprise (MNE) Group meeting the prescribed consolidated group revenue threshold, or where the taxable person individually exceeds the prescribed standalone revenue threshold, or a combination of the two conditions set out in Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 and related guidance. Critically, neither document is submitted automatically alongside the Corporate Tax return — the obligation is to maintain them, keep them current, and produce them to the FTA within the stipulated period, generally 30 days, if a request is issued. This 'maintain, don't file' structure is where PNPC sees the most costly misunderstanding: businesses treat the absence of an annual filing requirement as the absence of any obligation at all, and only discover the documentation was supposed to already exist the day an FTA information request lands.

The Local File is built from a Functional, Asset and Risk analysis of each material related-party and Connected Person transaction category — what the UAE entity actually does, what assets and intangibles it owns or uses, and what commercial risks it genuinely bears — because that analysis, not a template, determines which of the five OECD-recognised pricing methods (Comparable Uncontrolled Price, Resale Price, Cost Plus, Transactional Net Margin Method, or Transactional Profit Split) is appropriate for each transaction type. The Master File, by contrast, is a group-level narrative; where a foreign parent already prepares one for another jurisdiction under a comparable BEPS Action 13 regime, PNPC's role is frequently to adapt and align that existing document to UAE requirements rather than to build one from a blank page, provided it genuinely reflects the group's current structure and intangible ownership.

The FTA's own Transfer Pricing Guide (CTGTP1) is explicit that documentation should be contemporaneous — prepared and reassessed at least annually to reflect the business as it actually operates that year — rather than assembled reactively once a request arrives. A Local File built inside a 30-day response window, using historical data that has to be reconstructed rather than data captured as the year progressed, is measurably weaker than one maintained as a matter of course. PNPC scopes every Master File and Local File engagement to sit alongside the annual Corporate Tax return cycle specifically so the documentation is filing-ready well before any request could arrive, and reconciles every disclosed figure to the Related Party Transactions disclosure form and the audited financial statements before the file is considered complete.

When Master File and Local File preparation is required

The UAE taxable person is part of an MNE Group whose consolidated group revenue meets or exceeds the prescribed threshold under Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023, or the entity itself exceeds the prescribed standalone revenue threshold

The entity has material related-party transactions — intercompany sales of goods, management fees, royalties, intercompany loans, cost allocations — with a foreign parent, sister company, or a mainland-Free Zone affiliate under common control

A Qualifying Free Zone Person in the group needs its related-party pricing documented so an FTA review cannot recharacterise Qualifying Income and threaten the 0% rate

The group already prepares a global Master File for another jurisdiction's BEPS Action 13 regime and needs it adapted, reviewed for currency, and aligned to UAE-specific requirements rather than rebuilt from scratch

An FTA information request or Corporate Tax audit has been issued and the Local File or Master File must be produced within the stipulated window, generally 30 days

A prior-year Related Party Transactions disclosure form was filed without a Local File or benchmarking study behind the figures, leaving numbers on record with no supporting documentation

The group has grown, restructured, or crossed the Master File threshold for the first time and needs the documentation built from a related-party map and transaction inventory rather than assumed complete

Owner or director remuneration, related-party rent, or shareholder loan interest has never been benchmarked and needs Connected Person support within the Local File for Corporate Tax deductibility purposes

The group spans UAE mainland, one or more Free Zones, and one or more foreign jurisdictions, so the Local File needs entity-specific benchmarking rather than a single group-wide policy applied uniformly

When a full Master File and Local File build is not the immediate need

Related-party transaction values sit below the disclosure and documentation thresholds under Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 — a scoping review is worthwhile, but a full Local File and Master File are unlikely to be proportionate

The taxable person has no related-party or connected-person transactions at all — the Master File and Local File obligation only arises where a qualifying relationship and threshold are both met

The immediate need is only the annual Related Party Transactions disclosure form, and the group is below the Local File and Master File thresholds — that is a narrower, separate filing exercise PNPC scopes independently

The group's Reporting Entity status and CbCR threshold position have not yet been confirmed — that determination is a distinct, earlier step from Local File and Master File preparation, though the three obligations are frequently assessed together

The entity is an Exempt Person under the Corporate Tax Law, or otherwise confirmed outside its scope, subject to the exemption conditions continuing to be met and periodically re-verified

Audited financial statements for the relevant year are not yet finalised — Local File figures need to reconcile to final numbers, so it is usually more efficient to align documentation timing with the closed accounts

The engagement is purely about designing a transfer pricing policy for a not-yet-implemented arrangement — that is prospective policy design, a related but distinct step PNPC typically sequences before the Local File captures the resulting transactions

Management expects the documentation to justify a pricing outcome already decided for tax-saving reasons rather than to evidence the genuinely arm's length position — the Local File documents what is defensible, not a predetermined answer

Structure Comparison

Master File and Local File obligation by taxable person profile

ProfileLocal File RequiredMaster File RequiredTypical TriggerDocumentation Discipline Needed
Standalone UAE entity, no related partiesNoNoNo qualifying related-party or connected-person relationship existsConfirm and re-test annually — group structure can change
UAE entity with related-party transactions below the disclosure thresholdNoNoTransaction values sit below the Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 thresholdsMonitor in aggregate — several small transactions can cross the threshold together even where none does alone
UAE entity above disclosure threshold, below Local File thresholdNoNoRelated-party transactions material enough to disclose but below the standalone or group revenue thresholdDisclosure form only, reconciled to the financial statements
UAE entity meeting the standalone revenue threshold or part of an in-scope MNE GroupYesYes, if the MNE Group consolidated revenue threshold is separately metStandalone revenue threshold met independently, or the group as a whole meets the consolidated thresholdFull FAR analysis, method selection, benchmarking, and Master File narrative — maintained, not filed automatically
UAE subsidiary of a foreign MNE Group with an existing global Master FileYes — UAE-specific, cannot rely solely on the foreign documentOften adapted from the existing group Master File rather than rebuiltGroup threshold met at the consolidated level; foreign parent already documents elsewhereCurrency and consistency review of the adapted Master File plus a UAE-specific Local File and benchmarking search
UAE Free Zone entity, including a Qualifying Free Zone Person, with related-party dealingsYes, if thresholds met — QFZP status does not exempt from transfer pricing rulesYes, if the group threshold is metRelated-party dealings with mainland or foreign affiliates at values crossing the applicable thresholdLocal File must additionally address the QFZP Qualifying Income interaction, not just general arm's length compliance
UAE entity subject to an active FTA information requestYes — must be produced within the stipulated window, generally 30 daysYes, if group threshold met, produced in the same windowFTA has issued a specific request touching related-party transactionsDocumentation must already exist or be assembled and defensible on an urgent timeline

Thresholds for the Local File and Master File obligations are set by the Ministry of Finance under Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 and can be revised by further Cabinet or Ministerial Decision. PNPC confirms which row applies to your structure against the current thresholds at the start of every engagement rather than assuming last year's conclusion still holds.

How it works
#Stage & What PNPC DoesWhat Groups Miss Without a CA FirmTimeline
1Threshold Confirmation — establish whether the Local File and/or Master File obligation actually appliesThe standalone revenue threshold and the MNE Group consolidated revenue threshold are tested independently — an entity can be below one and still be caught by the other through its group membership. We test both against the current Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 thresholds rather than assuming last year's position.Week 1
2Related-Party & Connected-Person MappingEvery related entity — foreign parent, sister companies, mainland-Free Zone pairs under common control — and every Connected Person under Article 36 is identified against the ownership and control tests, not taken from a self-declared list.Week 1–2
3Transaction Inventory & Materiality ScreeningEvery intercompany flow catalogued by category — goods, services, management fees, royalties, loans and guarantees, cost allocations, Connected Person payments — and screened against the Local File threshold in aggregate, so smaller items that add up are not missed.Week 2
4Functional, Asset & Risk (FAR) Analysis for the Local FileFor each material transaction category, a structured analysis of which entity performs which functions, owns which assets including intangibles, and bears which risks — the technical basis the method selection has to rest on.Week 2–3
5Method Selection Per Transaction CategoryThe most appropriate of the five OECD-recognised methods selected per category from the FAR analysis and comparable-data availability, not defaulted to a single method across every transaction type.Week 3
6Benchmarking Study for the Local FileAn independent comparable search using recognised commercial databases, with documented screening and rejection criteria, producing a defensible arm's length range rather than a single unsupported figure.Week 3–5
7Local File DraftingEntity-specific narrative — business description, FAR analysis, method rationale, benchmarking outcome, Connected Person treatment — written in the structure the FTA's Transfer Pricing Guide expects, ready to be produced within the stipulated window.Week 4–6
8Master File Sourcing — new build or adaptation of an existing group documentWhere a global Master File already exists for another jurisdiction, it is reviewed for whether it genuinely reflects current group structure, intangible ownership, and consolidated financials before being adapted — an outdated foreign Master File adopted without review is a common defect.Week 5–7, parallel
9Master File Drafting or FinalisationGroup-wide narrative — organisational structure, business description, intangibles, intercompany financing, consolidated financial and tax position — built or finalised to the content Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 prescribes.Week 6–7
10Reconciliation to the Related Party Transactions Disclosure Form and Financial StatementsEvery figure in the Local File is checked against the disclosure form filed with the Corporate Tax return and against the audited financial statements — a mismatch between these documents is one of the most common triggers for an FTA follow-up query.Week 7
11Internal Review & Sign-OffA senior reviewer independent of the original preparer checks both files before presentation to management or the Board, creating a governance trail that itself supports the arm's length position.Week 7
12Indexed Retention Pack Assembly — ready for production, not filed automaticallyBoth documents, the benchmarking evidence, the FAR working papers, and the reconciliation are indexed and stored ready to hand the FTA within the stipulated production window — the pack itself is the deliverable, since neither document is submitted routinely.Week 8
13Ongoing Monitoring, Annual Refresh & FTA Query SupportThe benchmarking study's financial inputs are refreshed annually, structural changes are reflected, and if the FTA raises a query, we produce documentation within the stipulated window and engage directly on the technical position.Ongoing, PNPC on call

A first-time Master File and Local File build typically runs 6–8 weeks from kick-off to a filing-ready, indexed pack, timed to complete well ahead of the Corporate Tax return due date (generally within nine months of financial year end). Annual refresh engagements for existing clients move materially faster since the structural analysis and comparable methodology carry forward.

Document Checklist
Group & Ownership Structure

Group organisational chart showing every entity, ownership percentage, and country of incorporation or tax residence, current as at the relevant financial year end

UAE trade licence(s) for every UAE entity involved, including Free Zone entities with the specific Free Zone authority named

Shareholder registers or equivalent evidence of ownership, needed to test related-party status against Article 35 thresholds

Details of directors, key management personnel, and their close family relationships relevant to Connected Person status under Article 36

Qualifying Free Zone Person election status and supporting basis, where any Free Zone entity in the group has elected the 0% regime

Financial & Corporate Tax Records

Audited or management financial statements for the UAE entity for the relevant financial year

Consolidated group financial statements, needed for Master File content and threshold testing at the group level

Corporate Tax Registration Number (TRN) for the UAE taxable person

Prior-year Corporate Tax computations and any Related Party Transactions disclosure forms already filed

Trial balance or general ledger extract isolating intercompany transaction values by counterparty and category

Intercompany Agreements & Transaction Evidence

Signed intercompany agreements — management service agreements, cost-sharing arrangements, distribution or supply agreements, royalty or licence agreements, intercompany loan agreements

Invoices, debit/credit notes, or ledger entries evidencing actual intercompany flows and the amounts involved

Details of intercompany loans and guarantees — principal, interest rate applied, tenure, and any security arrangement

Existing global Master File, if one already exists at group level, for review and adaptation to UAE requirements

Transfer pricing documentation already prepared for other jurisdictions in the group, for consistency review

Functional, Asset & Risk (FAR) Information

Description of the UAE entity's business activities and its role in the group's overall value chain

Details of tangible and intangible assets owned or used by the UAE entity, including any group intellectual property housed in the UAE

Risk allocation — which entity carries market risk, credit risk, inventory risk, and foreign exchange risk on the transactions being documented

Employee headcount and functional breakdown for the UAE entity — sales, operations, management, and support roles

Connected Person Payments (For the Local File)

Payroll records and employment contracts covering owner or director remuneration, including benefits-in-kind

Lease agreements where a related party or connected person is the landlord of business premises used by the company

Shareholder loan documentation — principal, interest rate, and repayment terms, in either direction

Any existing market benchmarking reference already available to support the current terms

Master File-Specific Group Information

Description of the group's overall business, its key value drivers, and its main geographic markets

List and description of important intangibles owned by the group and which entities legally own them

Description of the group's intercompany financing arrangements, including with unrelated lenders

Group's consolidated financial statements and a list of important agreements related to intangibles between group members

Ongoing obligations
PhaseTriggered ByPNPC GuidanceRisk If Ignored
Threshold AssessmentCorporate Tax registration or the group crossing the standalone or consolidated revenue threshold for the first timeEstablish precisely whether the Local File, Master File, or both apply, against the current Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 thresholds, and set up the transaction inventory from day one.Assuming the threshold has not been crossed, without testing it against actual group-consolidated figures, leaves a genuine documentation obligation undiscovered until an FTA request arrives.
First-Time BuildThreshold confirmed as met, no existing Local File or Master File on recordRun the full related-party mapping, FAR analysis, method selection, benchmarking, and drafting sequence, timed to complete ahead of the Corporate Tax return due date, not reactively after a request.A first Local File assembled inside a 30-day FTA response window, without contemporaneous records or a properly screened benchmarking search, is measurably weaker than one built in the ordinary course.
Annual Refresh CycleEach financial year approaching its Corporate Tax return due dateRefresh the benchmarking study's financial inputs, update the Local File and Master File for any structural change, reconcile every figure to the financial statements, and re-confirm the disclosure form matches.Stale or inconsistent figures across the disclosure form, Local File and financial statements are a direct audit trigger, regardless of whether the underlying pricing was reasonable.
Master File Currency CheckGroup restructuring, new intangible ownership, or a change in the group's financing arrangementsRe-verify that any adapted global Master File still reflects the group's actual current structure and intangible ownership before relying on it for a UAE production — an outdated adopted document is a documented weakness.A Master File describing a structure the group has since outgrown reads as inconsistent with the Local File and the group's own consolidated accounts if an FTA reviewer compares them.
FTA Information Request or AuditFTA issues a request touching related-party transactionsProduce the Local File and Master File within the stipulated period, generally 30 days, with a clear supporting narrative, and engage the FTA directly on the technical basis for the pricing applied.Missing the response window, or handing over documentation that does not withstand scrutiny, risks a transfer pricing adjustment plus additional Corporate Tax, penalties, and interest.
Qualifying Free Zone Person ReviewAnnual QFZP status confirmation or a Free Zone entity restructuringConfirm the Local File's related-party pricing conclusions have not caused Qualifying Income to fail the arm's length condition or breach the permitted non-qualifying revenue threshold.Losing QFZP status because of undocumented or mispriced related-party dealings shifts the entity's income onto the standard 9% rate — often a far larger cost than the documentation itself.
Group Restructuring or ExpansionM&A, new subsidiary, mainland-to-Free-Zone conversion, or a new cross-border flowRe-run the related-party map, transaction inventory, and threshold test whenever the structure changes materially — last year's Local File and Master File conclusions may no longer reflect this year's group.An outdated related-party map means new flows go undocumented, and the exposure compounds with every additional year it is not caught.
Dispute or AdjustmentFTA proposes a transfer pricing adjustment following review of the produced Local File or Master FileAssess the technical merits, prepare a formal response or reconsideration request backed by the FAR analysis and benchmarking evidence, and advise on settlement versus escalation.An unchallenged adjustment can set an unfavourable precedent for later years and invite a broader-scope review of other related-party dealings in the group.

The Master File and Local File obligation is a recurring, maintain-and-produce-on-request obligation, not a one-time filing — it re-triggers every financial year and on every material change to group structure, ownership, or intercompany arrangement. PNPC's annual retainer is built to keep both documents contemporaneous rather than reconstructed under audit pressure.

Frequently asked
What is the difference between the Master File and the Local File?

The Master File presents the group-wide picture — organisational structure, business description, intangible ownership, intercompany financing, and consolidated financial position — and is common across every entity in the group. The Local File is entity-specific, covering the UAE taxable person's own material related-party transactions, its FAR analysis, the method applied to each transaction category, and the benchmarking evidence supporting the pricing used. Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 requires both where the applicable thresholds are met, and they serve different, complementary purposes for an FTA reviewer.

Practitioner noteClients sometimes assume one document supersedes the other because they cover overlapping ground. They do not — an FTA reviewer expects to read the group narrative and the entity-specific evidence together, not either one alone.
Do we have to file the Master File and Local File with the Corporate Tax return every year?

No. Neither document is submitted automatically alongside the Corporate Tax return. The obligation is to maintain both, keep them current, and produce them to the FTA within the stipulated period, generally 30 days, if the FTA requests them. What is filed with the return is the separate Related Party Transactions disclosure form, which is a shorter schedule, not the full Local File or Master File.

Practitioner noteThis 'maintain, don't file' structure is the single most common misunderstanding we see. Businesses treat the absence of an annual submission requirement as the absence of any obligation — until an FTA request arrives and the documentation does not yet exist.
What triggers the requirement to prepare a Local File?

The Local File is required where the taxable person individually exceeds the prescribed standalone revenue threshold, or is part of an MNE Group meeting the prescribed consolidated group revenue threshold, under Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023. Both conditions are tested independently — an entity below the standalone threshold can still be caught through its group's consolidated position.

Practitioner noteWe test both thresholds separately at the start of every engagement. Testing only the entity's own revenue and stopping there is a common shortcut that misses the group-level trigger.
What does the Master File actually need to contain?

Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 prescribes the Master File content in line with the OECD's BEPS Action 13 framework: the group's organisational structure, a description of its businesses and key value drivers, the ownership and location of important intangibles and related agreements, a description of the group's intercompany financing arrangements, and the group's consolidated financial and tax position. It is a narrative document about the group as a whole, not the UAE entity specifically.

Practitioner noteThe intangibles section is where self-prepared Master Files most often fall short — groups describe their products but not who legally owns the underlying intellectual property, which is exactly what the section is meant to establish.
What does the Local File need to contain?

A description of the UAE entity's business and its role in the group's value chain, a listing of its material related-party and connected-person transactions by category, the FAR analysis behind those transactions, the transfer pricing method selected for each category with supporting rationale, and the benchmarking analysis — comparable search, screening criteria, and resulting arm's length range — that evidences the pricing applied.

Practitioner noteThe FAR analysis is the section that actually drives everything else. A Local File with a polished benchmarking table but a thin or generic FAR section is not defensible, because the method selection has nothing solid to rest on.
Our foreign parent already has a global Master File. Can we just use that for the UAE?

Often yes, with review — an existing global Master File can typically be adapted for UAE purposes rather than rebuilt from scratch, provided it genuinely reflects the group's current structure, intangible ownership, and consolidated financials. What cannot be borrowed from the parent's documentation is the Local File, which must be UAE-entity-specific and cannot rely solely on a foreign document's generic content.

Practitioner noteWe always check the global Master File's currency before adopting it — we have seen groups hand over a Master File describing a structure the group has since materially outgrown through acquisitions or a restructuring.
How long do we have to produce the Local File and Master File if the FTA asks for them?

The stipulated production period is generally 30 days from the FTA's request, though the precise timeframe should be confirmed against the specific request received and current FTA guidance. Because this window is short relative to the analytical work involved in a defensible study, PNPC's standard approach is to have both documents already built and indexed before any request arrives, not to start the analysis once the clock starts running.

Practitioner noteThirty days sounds workable until you try to run a proper benchmarking search and reconstruct historical FAR detail inside it. That timeline is meant for producing an existing document, not for building one from scratch.
What happens if we cannot produce the Local File or Master File within the stipulated window?

If the FTA requests the documentation and the taxable person cannot produce it, or produces documentation that does not adequately support the pricing applied, the FTA can adjust the taxable income to what it considers the arm's length outcome would have been. This can mean additional Corporate Tax, administrative penalties for non-compliance, and interest on the additional tax from the original due date.

Practitioner noteThe adjustment risk is real, but the penalty for simply failing to maintain adequate documentation is often the more immediate and avoidable cost — it applies regardless of whether the underlying pricing was actually defensible.
How does PNPC select the transfer pricing method for each transaction in the Local File?

Method selection follows the FAR analysis, not the other way around. For each material transaction category we assess which party performs which functions, owns which assets including intangibles, and bears which commercial risks, and select the most appropriate of the five OECD-recognised methods — Comparable Uncontrolled Price, Resale Price, Cost Plus, Transactional Net Margin Method, or Transactional Profit Split — based on that analysis and the availability of reliable comparable data.

Practitioner noteDefaulting to TNMM across every transaction category without testing whether CUP or Cost Plus actually fits the facts better is a shortcut that weakens the Local File even when the final number happens to be reasonable.
Does the Local File need to cover owner or director remuneration?

Yes, where the amounts are material. Payments and benefits to Connected Persons under Article 36 — owner or director salary, rent paid on premises they personally own, interest on shareholder loans — must be at market value to remain fully deductible for Corporate Tax purposes, and the Local File should document the benchmarking that supports those terms alongside the entity's related-party transactions.

Practitioner noteConnected Person payments are the section most often left out of self-prepared Local Files, because finance teams mentally file owner salary and director rent as ordinary payroll or overheads rather than related-party dealings that need arm's length support.
How does a Qualifying Free Zone Person's Local File differ from a mainland entity's?

The content requirements are the same, but a Qualifying Free Zone Person's Local File carries an additional, higher-stakes dimension: if related-party pricing with a mainland or foreign affiliate is found not to be arm's length, the FTA can recharacterise the income involved, which can affect whether it still counts as Qualifying Income and, in more serious cases, threaten the QFZP status itself if non-qualifying revenue exceeds the permitted threshold.

Practitioner noteThis is the highest-value conversation we have with Free Zone clients preparing a Local File. The gap between the 0% QFZP rate and the standard 9% rate on the same income routinely dwarfs the entire cost of the documentation engagement.
How often does the benchmarking study in the Local File need refreshing?

The financial data underlying the study is generally refreshed annually to reflect the tested party's actual results for the year. The underlying comparable company search itself is typically refreshed on a multi-year cycle, commonly every three years or sooner if the industry or the entity's functional profile changes materially, consistent with OECD guidance on documentation currency.

Practitioner noteA Local File that is simply copied year after year with only the revenue figure updated is a documented red flag on review. We track the search refresh due-date on the cover of every deliverable pack.
Do the Master File and Local File need to reconcile to the Related Party Transactions disclosure form?

Yes, and this reconciliation is one of the most important quality checks PNPC performs before considering either document complete. The disclosure form is filed with the Corporate Tax return and is what the FTA sees first — if its figures do not match the Local File and the audited financial statements exactly, that mismatch is one of the most common triggers for a follow-up FTA information request.

Practitioner noteWe reconcile every disclosed figure line-by-line to the Local File and the accounts before filing anything. An innocent categorisation or currency-conversion mismatch invites exactly the scrutiny a well-prepared Local File is meant to avoid.
Is Country-by-Country Reporting the same thing as the Master File and Local File?

No, though they are related tiers of the same OECD BEPS Action 13 documentation framework. CbCR, governed by Cabinet Resolution No. 44 of 2020 as amended, is a group-level, jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction financial breakdown filed with the Ministry of Finance, separate from the FTA. The Master File and Local File are governed by Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 and are maintained for, and produced to, the FTA. A group above the CbCR threshold is very likely also in scope for the Master File and Local File, and PNPC scopes and builds all three together where applicable.

Practitioner noteGroups above the CbCR threshold sometimes assume the CbCR itself satisfies the Local File obligation because both involve related-party data. It does not — the CbCR is a financial summary; the Local File is a transaction-level analytical document with a completely different structure and purpose.
How long does a first-time Master File and Local File build take?

For a first-time engagement with reasonably prompt data turnaround, PNPC typically completes related-party mapping, FAR analysis, method selection, benchmarking, and full drafting of both documents within 6 to 8 weeks, timed to be filing-ready ahead of the Corporate Tax return due date. Delays in document collection from the client are the most common cause of timeline slippage.

Practitioner noteWe recommend starting at least two to three months before the Corporate Tax return due date. A rushed benchmarking study is a weaker one, and the FTA's expectations do not relax because the deadline is close.
Can PNPC help if we already missed a year of Master File and Local File preparation?

Yes. For groups that have already passed one or more Corporate Tax financial years without formal documentation, we assess the exposure, reconstruct the best-available FAR analysis and benchmarking support for the closed periods using whatever records exist, and put a contemporaneous process in place going forward. Retrospective work is inherently constrained by data availability, but it puts the business in a materially stronger position than facing an FTA request with nothing on file.

Practitioner noteThe earlier a documentation gap is identified and addressed voluntarily, the more remediation options exist. Waiting until an FTA notice arrives removes most of that flexibility.
How is the Master File and Local File engagement priced?

PNPC scopes the engagement based on the number of related-party transaction categories requiring benchmarking, whether the Master File needs to be built new or can be adapted from an existing group document, the complexity of the FAR analysis, and whether this is a first-time build or an annual refresh. A fixed, written fee is agreed after an initial scoping call and before work begins.

Practitioner noteAnnual refresh engagements are materially less expensive than the first-time build, because the related-party map, FAR analysis and method selection carry forward and only financial inputs and structural changes need updating.
Why should we build the Local File and Master File now if the FTA hasn't asked for them yet?

Because the obligation to maintain contemporaneous documentation exists from the moment the thresholds are met, independent of whether a request is ever issued, and because a document built in the ordinary course — with FAR conversations held while they are current and a benchmarking search run without deadline pressure — is measurably stronger than one reconstructed inside a 30-day response window. Waiting also means several years of undocumented related-party activity can accumulate before the gap is discovered.

Practitioner noteWe have never had a client regret building the documentation early. We have had clients regret waiting, once an FTA request arrived with a 30-day clock already running.
Why PNPC Global

PNPC Master File & Local File preparation vs. generic compliance filers and DIY templates

DimensionPNPCGeneric Filer / DIY Template
Threshold testingStandalone and MNE Group consolidated thresholds tested independently against current Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 figuresOnly the entity's own revenue tested, missing the group-level trigger
Related-party identificationIndependently verified against Article 35/36 ownership and control thresholdsRelies on the client's self-declared list without independent verification
FAR analysis depthStructured, transaction-category-specific analysis underpinning method selectionGeneric industry description substituted for entity-specific functional analysis
Method selectionSelected per transaction category from the FAR analysis, not defaultedDefault TNMM applied broadly, regardless of transaction type
Benchmarking rigourDocumented, screened comparable set with a transparent rejection matrixTemplated or recycled comparable sets with limited screening detail
Master File currency checkAdopted global Master Files reviewed for whether they still reflect the current group structure before useForeign Master File adopted without review of currency or accuracy
Connected Person coverageOwner and director remuneration, related-party rent, and loan interest independently benchmarked within the Local FileOften left undocumented or treated as ordinary payroll
QFZP interactionExplicit review of how the Local File's pricing conclusions affect Qualifying Income and 0% statusRarely addressed — treated as an unrelated filing
Production readinessIndexed pack built and maintained ahead of any FTA request, ready within the stipulated windowAssembled reactively only after a request is received
Disclosure reconciliationEvery Local File figure tied line-by-line to the disclosure form and audited statements before sign-offDisclosure form populated independently, leaving mismatches that invite queries

What the PNPC package includes

  1. 01

    Standalone and MNE Group consolidated threshold testing against current Ministerial Decision No. 97 of 2023 figures

  2. 02

    Full related-party and connected-person mapping against Articles 35 and 36 of the Corporate Tax Law

  3. 03

    Transaction inventory and materiality assessment across every intercompany flow, including Connected Person payments

  4. 04

    Functional, Asset and Risk (FAR) analysis for each material transaction category

  5. 05

    Transfer pricing method selection with documented rationale per category

  6. 06

    Independent benchmarking study using recognised commercial comparable databases

  7. 07

    Local File drafting in FTA Transfer Pricing Guide-ready format

  8. 08

    Master File preparation or adaptation and currency review of an existing group document

  9. 09

    Connected Person payment benchmarking — owner/director remuneration, related-party rent, shareholder loan interest

  10. 10

    Qualifying Free Zone Person interaction review where a Free Zone entity sits in the group

  11. 11

    Reconciliation of Local File figures to the Related Party Transactions disclosure form and audited financial statements

  12. 12

    Indexed, production-ready retention pack maintained ahead of any FTA request

  13. 13

    FTA information request and audit response support, including production within the stipulated window

  14. 14

    Annual refresh retainer covering financial data updates, structural change reviews, and regulatory monitoring

  15. 15

    Documented benchmarking search due-date tracker for the multi-year comparable refresh

  16. 16

    Initial scoping call with a reasoned threshold conclusion and written assumptions before engagement

Build your Master File and Local File before the FTA's 30-day clock starts, not after — speak to PNPC's Dubai transfer pricing desk.

Jurisdiction

🇦🇪
United Arab Emirates

Free zone, mainland & offshore

Ready to get started?

Tell us about your requirement — a UAE specialist responds within 24 hours.

← Back to Transfer Pricing